“Existed For Few Years Now”: Sunil Gavaskar Highlights India’s “Drawback” In T20Is | Cricket Information
File picture of Sunil Gavaskar© AFP
Group India didn’t get off to a perfect begin within the ongoing three-match T20I sequence towards Australia because the hosts didn’t defend 208 runs in Mohali, and the bowlers weren’t capable of put up a spirited combating show. Solely Axar Patel managed to take wickets together with being economical. Within the first T20I, Jasprit Bumrah didn’t characteristic within the enjoying XI and it must be seen whether or not he comes again instantly for the must-win second T20I.
Former India captain Sunil Gavaskar feels that not having the ability to defend totals with out Jasprit Bumrah has been India’s drawback for lengthy interval now, and the administration must do some course correction.
“That is India’s weak spot. This is not a brand new drawback. It has existed for just a few years now that when they’re defending, they discover it tough with out Jasprit Bumrah. When Bumrah is there, the rating may be defended however with out him, they offer away even 200-plus totals. Having stated that, we have to take a look at the answer for it. Else, going ahead, it might harm them,” Gavaskar stated on Sports activities Tak after the primary T20I between India and Australia.
When requested about his tackle Jasprit Bumrah, Gavaskar stated: “About his (Bumrah’s) health, I really feel that since he’s such an necessary member of the workforce, the workforce administration desires him to be completely match and solely then he be picked in India’s XI. Possibly he’ll play in Nagpur.”
“However right here is the factor. When the Indian workforce is chasing a goal, they win matches. However it’s the alternative the opposite means round. The bowling that’s wanted between overs 16 and 20, they nonetheless haven’t got it. That is the explanation that workforce is ending up on the shedding facet,” he added.
India and Australia will sq. off within the second T20I on Friday in Nagpur.
Subjects talked about on this article